Tuesday, June 8, 2010 | 3:03 pm
J Kristiadi
Is there a relationship between the fund and the aspirations of pork? For more details, you need the following information. Dana aspiration is proposed, which is impressive "origin" so that every member of the Golkar Party, the Parliament can be allocated Rp 15 billion per year. Said to assist in the distribution of electoral districts. These funds come from the people and the total tax each year by more than Rp 8 trillion. Drawdown was facilitated by representatives of the people.
While vocabulary segentong (meat) pork, the country of origin, commonly called pork-barrel. The title refers to the practice of allocation of public funds given to constituents by MPs so that they can be re-elected in subsequent elections. Political practice is much criticized and controversial because of more priority to personal interests rather than public interests as well as prone to fraud and false targets.
That said, origin of the term is known about the end of XVIII century, before the civil war in the United States. The story, which has been marinated pork was given as a gift to the black slaves for grabs. The provision, but it also defamation.
Therefore, it is understood that just copying ideas from other countries without in-depth assessment was received resistance from the government and at the same time a sharp criticism from the public. If in a country where democracy has been established it is prone to irregularities practice, can be imagined if carried out in Indonesia as a new democracy to the extent of the epidermis. Pig Gentong project will be very prone land abuse and can become the facilitator for money services.
It's no secret that penggerogotan State Budget, especially fund centers, such as a special allocation fund, the general allocation, and deconcentration, the land which can lead to corruption. Therefore, the regional head diligent search for a facilitator to these funds, in addition to swell, also flows into the region.
The proposal can institutionalize the practice of giving "candy" of political elites to voters in order to obtain political support. The difference is, if the gift is cash and candy and maybe carry some personal money, while the aspirations of funds through the scheme which they consider more sophisticated sourced entirely from state funds. But, essentially similar, namely poured state money for political purposes are concerned.
In fact, a number of political parties strongly criticized government policy ever considered use of public funds for the award of the 2009 election. Shape, among others, are direct cash assistance, business credit people, school operational assistance, special aid students, independent national program of community empowerment, alleviation programs in urban poor, and education voucher. Policies that use public funds for the benefit of winning the presidential election. However, such practices seemed to be the inspiration for the birth of the idea of the aspirations of funds.
Public resistance was getting stronger because of low levels of public confidence in political parties and representative institutions. The community is still not healed her hurt with the proposed construction of the Parliament building is said with a sloping ceiling plan funds nearly Rp 2 trillion.
Previously, similar projects is the installation of LCD TVs in the elevator, the procurement of computers, security systems are redundant at the Senayan Complex, House of Representatives Complex fencing project, and so forth. Thus, if the fair almost every proposal that comes from the House always direaksi negatively by the public.
Damaged structure
Such practices can not be justified, in addition to destroying the order of state enforcement of clean and true. First, implementing the policy, including the equitable distribution of regional development, is the executive realm. The function of Parliament is very firm and clear, namely, supervision, budgets, and legislation.
Second, equity in the region is set up with the scheme of decentralization, deconcentration, and the duty of assistance as stipulated in Law No. 33 of 2004 on Financial Balance between Central and Local Government. By forcing the fund's aspirations, will hit the local autonomy rule for the Regional Budget prepared by local governments and approved by regional people's representative institutions, rather than by Parliament.
Similarly, the arguments that rely on Article 15 Paragraph (3) of Law No 17/2003 on State Finance, which stated among others, the Parliament may propose changes in revenue and expenditure budget bill, it is very easy to be broken. They forgot that the Act confirms the power of state financial management in the executive branch, not the legislature. Therefore, the user is responsible to the executive budget in accordance with the levels of government in accordance with Law No. 1 / 2004 on State Treasury.
Hence also, the proposal is impressive carelessly canceled course. If you want to emulate the political practices in countries that have well-established democracy, not imitation-leather skin. Moreover if has proved more harm than good for society.
Better mimic how instill democratic values that the powers entrusted to them may actually be used to manage the country in order to bring prosperity and justice. Honorable mention for the representatives of the people is not a protocol, but actually in people's hearts.
J Kristiadi CSIS Senior Researcher
J Kristiadi
Is there a relationship between the fund and the aspirations of pork? For more details, you need the following information. Dana aspiration is proposed, which is impressive "origin" so that every member of the Golkar Party, the Parliament can be allocated Rp 15 billion per year. Said to assist in the distribution of electoral districts. These funds come from the people and the total tax each year by more than Rp 8 trillion. Drawdown was facilitated by representatives of the people.
While vocabulary segentong (meat) pork, the country of origin, commonly called pork-barrel. The title refers to the practice of allocation of public funds given to constituents by MPs so that they can be re-elected in subsequent elections. Political practice is much criticized and controversial because of more priority to personal interests rather than public interests as well as prone to fraud and false targets.
That said, origin of the term is known about the end of XVIII century, before the civil war in the United States. The story, which has been marinated pork was given as a gift to the black slaves for grabs. The provision, but it also defamation.
Therefore, it is understood that just copying ideas from other countries without in-depth assessment was received resistance from the government and at the same time a sharp criticism from the public. If in a country where democracy has been established it is prone to irregularities practice, can be imagined if carried out in Indonesia as a new democracy to the extent of the epidermis. Pig Gentong project will be very prone land abuse and can become the facilitator for money services.
It's no secret that penggerogotan State Budget, especially fund centers, such as a special allocation fund, the general allocation, and deconcentration, the land which can lead to corruption. Therefore, the regional head diligent search for a facilitator to these funds, in addition to swell, also flows into the region.
The proposal can institutionalize the practice of giving "candy" of political elites to voters in order to obtain political support. The difference is, if the gift is cash and candy and maybe carry some personal money, while the aspirations of funds through the scheme which they consider more sophisticated sourced entirely from state funds. But, essentially similar, namely poured state money for political purposes are concerned.
In fact, a number of political parties strongly criticized government policy ever considered use of public funds for the award of the 2009 election. Shape, among others, are direct cash assistance, business credit people, school operational assistance, special aid students, independent national program of community empowerment, alleviation programs in urban poor, and education voucher. Policies that use public funds for the benefit of winning the presidential election. However, such practices seemed to be the inspiration for the birth of the idea of the aspirations of funds.
Public resistance was getting stronger because of low levels of public confidence in political parties and representative institutions. The community is still not healed her hurt with the proposed construction of the Parliament building is said with a sloping ceiling plan funds nearly Rp 2 trillion.
Previously, similar projects is the installation of LCD TVs in the elevator, the procurement of computers, security systems are redundant at the Senayan Complex, House of Representatives Complex fencing project, and so forth. Thus, if the fair almost every proposal that comes from the House always direaksi negatively by the public.
Damaged structure
Such practices can not be justified, in addition to destroying the order of state enforcement of clean and true. First, implementing the policy, including the equitable distribution of regional development, is the executive realm. The function of Parliament is very firm and clear, namely, supervision, budgets, and legislation.
Second, equity in the region is set up with the scheme of decentralization, deconcentration, and the duty of assistance as stipulated in Law No. 33 of 2004 on Financial Balance between Central and Local Government. By forcing the fund's aspirations, will hit the local autonomy rule for the Regional Budget prepared by local governments and approved by regional people's representative institutions, rather than by Parliament.
Similarly, the arguments that rely on Article 15 Paragraph (3) of Law No 17/2003 on State Finance, which stated among others, the Parliament may propose changes in revenue and expenditure budget bill, it is very easy to be broken. They forgot that the Act confirms the power of state financial management in the executive branch, not the legislature. Therefore, the user is responsible to the executive budget in accordance with the levels of government in accordance with Law No. 1 / 2004 on State Treasury.
Hence also, the proposal is impressive carelessly canceled course. If you want to emulate the political practices in countries that have well-established democracy, not imitation-leather skin. Moreover if has proved more harm than good for society.
Better mimic how instill democratic values that the powers entrusted to them may actually be used to manage the country in order to bring prosperity and justice. Honorable mention for the representatives of the people is not a protocol, but actually in people's hearts.
J Kristiadi CSIS Senior Researcher