That if we open the pages of history of mankind, inter-religious conflict more dramatic rise and driven by political interests than on moral issues. What is meant by political interests in this paper is an interest relating to the control of the settings (the government / region), as well as business interests (money, land, assets, etc.). While the moral interest is a desire and hopes to assess and to judgments whether one's actions are good or bad. Standards of good and evil has become the primary mission of all religions in the world to legitimized or didelegitimasi.
However, today we see some of our elite, in this ordinance, has become a religion as an instrument to carry out politically charged scenario. Oddly religion was never made by their instruments to mendestruksi moral issues are a key issue was the development of livelihood in their immediate environment.
Thus, during the election season, religion is brought to confirm the identity of the people and build loyalty. Muslim-Christian confronted confronted. Moslems considered problematic 'morality' to-Islamannya if at the time of election he supported and choose select Christians. That Christians are considered out of his way if not select candidates who are not Christian. Fatwas were set scriptures scattered in all directions.
Turn to the problem of corruption, religion removed from the arena. Religion as guardians of morality far away. Religion is not used as instruments to combat the practices of moral violations. In fact they really understand that the moral violation has occurred so great. So no wonder if today there is no fatwa a politikuspun spoken out loud to make a protest against moral offenders (criminals) that.
Though their day-to-day politicians who claim religious claims and diligent to make the postulates of religion as a tool of provocation, never made the Religion as a backrest in formulating policies and guidelines in implementing the mandate of leadership.
I dare to express ideas above because I have sufficient experience in directing saturate the elites. More than 10 years I was in the circle of political elites in the ordinance, the village chief, Mr. Sub, Regent to the Governor. From religious leaders (he said), NGO activist (he said), culture (he said), boarding school or church leaders, to members of parliament.
I observe their behavior up close even from a position very close. Most of the same behavior that they never made the religion as a basis for prosecution in their leadership behavior. Although not all elites behave 'ambiguous' like that, but most are like that.
Most of the elites who have been 'chatting' with me it happened to Muslims. So I do not intend mendiskriditkan Muslim leaders. But yeah just tell me what my experiences during the 'bercegkrama' with the Muslim elite.
So, I also saw that they had had the title 'Pilgrim'. They often appear with less glossy black skullcap. Her face brightened and seemed very religious like a baby's face without sin. Speech 'Assalammualaikumnya' is also very eloquent, like 'assalammualaikum'nya priests mosques in the Arab State. They have very close to the scholars, administrators mosques, study groups. They are also very often held religious events smelled like recitation, dhikr, sympathize poor, etc.. Their house was decorated by the beautiful calligraphy, beautiful and so majestic. They look really understand what it is religion, following the standardized standard very hard on moral violations.
But it's really hard to believe that was behind the appearance of being so religious that they are able to manipulate their assistance to the mosque and the mosque (see findings CPC), skim money off the mosque highway construction funds (please refer to the current cash flow, one of the largest mosque in the city) , manipulating the social assistance budget (see the conflict between the elites of Pontianak City lately), do not act in accordance with the teachings of the religion which he believed (see Scandal one regional leader in the ordinance a few years ago). Whether in the place where religion, when they do that.
Immoral behavior is not only politicians knock over Islam, that non-Muslims also occur. Look at the news some time ago how Pope dizzy head because many churches are involved pemipin Sex Scandal. And quite a lot of stories from the mouth-kemulut some pastors who manipulate people donations.
After all, they are looking very strong leader in the religious. Are not they very close to religious leaders. They are not even part of religious leaders? Then as an interest, moral religion where yah? (Well you know, dizziness guns'?)
Today is not just in West Kalimantan, but also in most parts of the earth's human, people are more concerned with identity and social symbols of morality. Morality have been marginalized and the marginalized. Though religion was not originally sent down to uphold morality. Did not initially present religion without symbols and identity. Would not turunya religion is not dedicated as a political instrument?
Today, the spirit that drives the movement for the sake of morale has terpasung by uproarious terms of democracy with the political conflict in it. Currently, West Kalimantan and Indonesia also suffered moral power vacuum.
Imitating the Prophet's journey has been able to edify his flock with the morality movement without identity (is not a new religion popular after morality has been considered wrong?) Then becomes important for our young people, to make a moral as a frame of movement. Becomes important for us, young people, to not make the identity and symbols of religion as a basis for making decisions. In short, saatnyalah for us to make morality as the only standard to determine the pace and set the attitude for the behavior of politicians (old) at this time.
Movement enforcement of morality is not concerned with religious backgrounds, especially ethnic. Those who are innocent should not be our permission to hide behind the religious and ethnic interests, as is often the case in recent years.
Therefore, if we justify the opinion that criticism and protest against the religious leaders of A then it means that religious groups will benefit B, then it means we have entered the political frame that they made. Frame that makes religion and ethnicity as an instrument and bulwark to protect the interests of their pragmatic politics.
Political frame that has been worn and has proven unable to provide kotribusi for nation development. Political frame that we have to replace them with new ones. We require a large movement to create a frame to think that. A comparable movement of the prophets with less movement.
Like what, what and how, is the kite sile content to this discussion. (Hehe tired of writing neh ga)
However, today we see some of our elite, in this ordinance, has become a religion as an instrument to carry out politically charged scenario. Oddly religion was never made by their instruments to mendestruksi moral issues are a key issue was the development of livelihood in their immediate environment.
Thus, during the election season, religion is brought to confirm the identity of the people and build loyalty. Muslim-Christian confronted confronted. Moslems considered problematic 'morality' to-Islamannya if at the time of election he supported and choose select Christians. That Christians are considered out of his way if not select candidates who are not Christian. Fatwas were set scriptures scattered in all directions.
Turn to the problem of corruption, religion removed from the arena. Religion as guardians of morality far away. Religion is not used as instruments to combat the practices of moral violations. In fact they really understand that the moral violation has occurred so great. So no wonder if today there is no fatwa a politikuspun spoken out loud to make a protest against moral offenders (criminals) that.
Though their day-to-day politicians who claim religious claims and diligent to make the postulates of religion as a tool of provocation, never made the Religion as a backrest in formulating policies and guidelines in implementing the mandate of leadership.
I dare to express ideas above because I have sufficient experience in directing saturate the elites. More than 10 years I was in the circle of political elites in the ordinance, the village chief, Mr. Sub, Regent to the Governor. From religious leaders (he said), NGO activist (he said), culture (he said), boarding school or church leaders, to members of parliament.
I observe their behavior up close even from a position very close. Most of the same behavior that they never made the religion as a basis for prosecution in their leadership behavior. Although not all elites behave 'ambiguous' like that, but most are like that.
Most of the elites who have been 'chatting' with me it happened to Muslims. So I do not intend mendiskriditkan Muslim leaders. But yeah just tell me what my experiences during the 'bercegkrama' with the Muslim elite.
So, I also saw that they had had the title 'Pilgrim'. They often appear with less glossy black skullcap. Her face brightened and seemed very religious like a baby's face without sin. Speech 'Assalammualaikumnya' is also very eloquent, like 'assalammualaikum'nya priests mosques in the Arab State. They have very close to the scholars, administrators mosques, study groups. They are also very often held religious events smelled like recitation, dhikr, sympathize poor, etc.. Their house was decorated by the beautiful calligraphy, beautiful and so majestic. They look really understand what it is religion, following the standardized standard very hard on moral violations.
But it's really hard to believe that was behind the appearance of being so religious that they are able to manipulate their assistance to the mosque and the mosque (see findings CPC), skim money off the mosque highway construction funds (please refer to the current cash flow, one of the largest mosque in the city) , manipulating the social assistance budget (see the conflict between the elites of Pontianak City lately), do not act in accordance with the teachings of the religion which he believed (see Scandal one regional leader in the ordinance a few years ago). Whether in the place where religion, when they do that.
Immoral behavior is not only politicians knock over Islam, that non-Muslims also occur. Look at the news some time ago how Pope dizzy head because many churches are involved pemipin Sex Scandal. And quite a lot of stories from the mouth-kemulut some pastors who manipulate people donations.
After all, they are looking very strong leader in the religious. Are not they very close to religious leaders. They are not even part of religious leaders? Then as an interest, moral religion where yah? (Well you know, dizziness guns'?)
Today is not just in West Kalimantan, but also in most parts of the earth's human, people are more concerned with identity and social symbols of morality. Morality have been marginalized and the marginalized. Though religion was not originally sent down to uphold morality. Did not initially present religion without symbols and identity. Would not turunya religion is not dedicated as a political instrument?
Today, the spirit that drives the movement for the sake of morale has terpasung by uproarious terms of democracy with the political conflict in it. Currently, West Kalimantan and Indonesia also suffered moral power vacuum.
Imitating the Prophet's journey has been able to edify his flock with the morality movement without identity (is not a new religion popular after morality has been considered wrong?) Then becomes important for our young people, to make a moral as a frame of movement. Becomes important for us, young people, to not make the identity and symbols of religion as a basis for making decisions. In short, saatnyalah for us to make morality as the only standard to determine the pace and set the attitude for the behavior of politicians (old) at this time.
Movement enforcement of morality is not concerned with religious backgrounds, especially ethnic. Those who are innocent should not be our permission to hide behind the religious and ethnic interests, as is often the case in recent years.
Therefore, if we justify the opinion that criticism and protest against the religious leaders of A then it means that religious groups will benefit B, then it means we have entered the political frame that they made. Frame that makes religion and ethnicity as an instrument and bulwark to protect the interests of their pragmatic politics.
Political frame that has been worn and has proven unable to provide kotribusi for nation development. Political frame that we have to replace them with new ones. We require a large movement to create a frame to think that. A comparable movement of the prophets with less movement.
Like what, what and how, is the kite sile content to this discussion. (Hehe tired of writing neh ga)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar